|
Oxford History of Ancient Egypt
The
Oxford history seems to be referenced everywhere as
a source, and so I bought a copy several years ago.
It's not easy reading, by any means, and much more
like a textbook than a reference book.
Each section of the book (broken down by kingdom and
sometimes dynasty) is written by a different author,
all experts in their fields. Some, obviously, are
better writers than others, so some of the chapters
read like doctoral dissertations and others inject
some interesting "voice" into the documentation
of the period. I was completely put off by the first
chapters, which spend an inordinate amount of time
discussing pottery shapes, but managed to squeeze
past them and into the real meat of the book. Compared
to truly readable histories (like my favorite books,
History of Britain), these are dry and a bit more
like recitations of historical facts than anything
else. I never did sit down and read this one through
-- I just referenced the particular chapters when
I needed a bit of historical data (dates, or successions,
or location information).
For that purpose, this is one of the best references that I had. After our trip, I was pointed to a german book by Jurgen von Beckerath for even more detailed chronologies and information,
Chronologie des pharaonischen Ägypten
I use the timelines set forth in Oxford on most of
this website, but realize that they are not the only
accepted chronology for Egypt. We're dealing with
several thousand years of history, and most of the
periods are supported by only fragments of written
evidence that might suggest a timeline. Many chronologies
rely on written evidence from later historians (ie.,
Manetho or Herodotus) which is just as suspect as
any other set of dates. Check here for a bit more an explanation about dates
|